Differences-between-joint-tenancy-and-tenants-in-common

When purchasing property, the choice between joint tenancy and tenants in common profoundly influences how ownership is structured. These two types of ownership have distinct rules regarding property division and succession. While both provide co-owners with ownership rights and a share of the property, the key difference lies in the rules governing the death of one of the tenants.

In joint tenancy, co-owners, which can include more than two individuals, collectively own the entire property. They do not specify percentages; instead, each owner holds 100% jointly with the other. Married couples often opt for joint tenancy due to its “right of survivorship.” This means that upon the death of one joint tenant, the deceased’s share automatically passes to the surviving tenant(s) and does not become part of the deceased’s estate. One of the primary advantages of joint tenancy is the automatic right of survivorship. This simplifies the transfer of ownership upon the death of a co-owner, often making it less complex and less expensive compared to tenants in common.

In contrast, tenants in common own specific shares of the property, and these shares can be equal or unequal. Parties who are not automatically entitled to a right of survivorship, such as friends or siblings, usually choose tenancy in common. Upon the death of a tenant in common, their share becomes part of their estate and is distributed according to their Will or the laws of intestacy. Tenants in common offer flexibility in ownership percentages, allowing unequal shares based on individual financial contributions.

Contact Mint Legal at info@mintlegal.com.au or call on 0452441583.

Or click on the link www.mintlegal.com.au to go the website.

Comments

What is conveyancing in Queensland?

Conveyancing is the process of transferring ownership of land from one person to another, under the terms of a contract for the sale of that land. That’s it! Understanding how conveyancing works means understanding that every Australian State has different law, forms, regulations, fees, time requirements, protections, jargon and government departments as part of the conveyancing process. But basically each State follows the same steps – just the details changes. Whether you are buying or selling, there is a Contract that sets out the terms of the sale. The Buyer and Seller have obligations and rights under the Contract. The Conveyancer’s job is to make sure you do what you are supposed to do when you are supposed to do it. That is what Mint Legal does best. Buying or selling a House or Unit in Queensland Conveyancing is crucial in any property transaction. It ensures that the buyer obtains good and marketable title to the property and the rights that run with it, while seller is able ...

PROBATE IN QLD – what exactly is a Probate?

Understanding Probate in QLD When a loved one passes away, dealing with legal matters can be overwhelming. Yet, understanding the process is crucial to manage the deceased person's estate properly. One term you will likely encounter is Probate . But what exactly is a Probate or a similar Grant? Let's demystify this term and its implications in Queensland (QLD). What is Probate? Probate is a legal process that verifies a will's authenticity and confirms the executor's authority to manage the deceased's estate. It involves the Supreme Court, which grants the Probate upon the executor's application. Once granted, the executor can distribute the assets as per the will's instructions. When is Probate Required? In QLD, Probate is not always compulsory. It depends on the type of assets and their value. For instance, if the deceased owned real estate solely or jointly as tenants in common, Probate is usually required. Financial institutions may also request a Gra...

Fairbairn v Radecki (2022) HCA 18: Implications on how the law views de facto relationships

Understanding Fairbairn v Radecki: A Landmark Case in De Facto Relationship Law The legal definition and status of de facto relationships have long been a subject of debate in Australian family law. The recent High Court decision in Fairbairn v Radecki (2022) HCA 18 has provided significant clarification on how the law perceives and adjudicates upon these relationships. This blog post delves into the implications of this pivotal case and what it means for parties in a de facto relationship. The Background of Fairbairn v Radecki In Fairbairn v Radecki, the High Court was asked to consider whether a de facto relationship existed between Mr. Fairbairn and Ms. Radecki. The crux of the case involved examining the couple's living arrangements, financial interdependence, and the overall nature of their relationship. The decision reached by the High Court has set a precedent that will influence how similar cases are approached in the future. Criteria for Establishing a De Fac...

MINT LEGAL BRISBANE - 0452 441 583

Search This Blog